Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Baum's avatar

"Speaker handed out a definition of “Smart Growth” and information from the university extension office could be used to rectify the divide. Too little specifics in the 2050 plan, too broad."

Melanie, being in the industry, you should understand codes and ordinances are written specifically to be broad! This allows for flexibility for the needs of the Village change over time. To say we want Housing here limits the reality of what will actually work on this site. Light Industrial has proven to be the only use that will work in this area. It appears that you and your Village President are not versed in Planning Issues!

"The intent of what residents want for the village. The methodology of “Corridors, Neighborhoods & Districts” applied to the 2050 plan is adding to the divide in the village."

I disagree! The divide is between the Village and the Front Row! If we stop listening to the Front Row, I believe tensions will be reduced. Also, it is "Corridor, Districts and Nodes."

"Resident near Holy Hill warehouses confirms that the concerns about traffic, noise, light pollution have come true."

Melanie, the Village had approved several other options for Residential Development at this location. None of them were able to move forward. How do you respond to, "What the Residents wanted did not work! Now we have Development that will benefit the overall Village in the long run." Several times this area was approved for the Single Family Residential that you seek! Each time it failed! What more proof do you need that Residential will not work in this area!

"She also says that motorcyclists are using the warehouse parking lots on the weekends as a playground, very noisy." Call the Police and report the Public Nuisance.

"Requests the long overdue neighborhood meeting that has been ignored by the previous administration." I disagree! As you should know, being in the industry, the way planing works is that a Developer can come forward at anytime and request that the zoning be changed. Until a Developer for this area is at the table, whatever people say they want there is subject to change. It has not been ignored! It is waiting a stimulus!

Melaine, have your viewers voice an opinion as to how many meetings with Developers are appropriate. I have asked this in many forums and never get a consistent response.

"Director Jeff Retzlaff provides and overview of the history of this amendment to the SSSA."

This was discussed in detail when the Gateway Park was established! I specifically asked about it! "What are the limits of the area?" "Can the system handle it?" "What overall area can the System handle?"

"Hasn’t been done since 1983 in a holistic way."

Are you kidding!!!

Happy to discuss any of your topics in detail with the Residents of our Village.

Trustee David Baum Dist. #1

Expand full comment

No posts